Art for Goodness Sake: A Chestertonian Critique of Art for Art’s Sake

The Chesterton Review 45 (1/2):123-127 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many Christian thinkers have embraced the notion “art for art’s sake.” Chesterton did not. To the contrary, he saw such an idea as deeply problematic for a Christian aesthetic. In the following article, I will explore some philosophical aspects of the “art for art’s sake” movement and then explain why Chesterton parted company with it.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dewey's Critique of Art for Art's Sake.Donald P. Kuspit - 1968 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 27 (1):93-98.
Aesthetic censorship: Censoring art for art's sake.Richard Shusterman - 1984 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43 (2):171-180.
Art for Life's Sake Life for Art's Sake.Babatunde Lawal - 1987 - Obafemi Awolowo University Press.
Dewey's critique of art for art's sake.Donald B. Kuspit - 1968 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 27 (1):93-98.
The aesthetics of “art for art’s sake”.Irving Singer - 1954 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 12 (3):343-359.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-05

Downloads
275 (#75,933)

6 months
139 (#32,089)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Miguel Benitez
State College of Florida

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references