What if Consciousness has no Function?

Biosemiotics 16 (2):259-267 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this commentary, as philosophers of evolutionary biology, we will consider the evolutionary framework used in the Target Article by: (i) emphasising the fruitfulness of the interdisciplinary approach employed; (ii) highlighting some potentially controversial aspects of the proposal; and finally (iii) outlining some ideas for further integration within the UAL framework. The critical analysis will focus on the relationship between learning and consciousness, on the assumed need for a function for consciousness, and on the type of phylogenetic demarcation introduced by UAL.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-19

Downloads
31 (#532,577)

6 months
11 (#271,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Sofia Belardinelli
University of Naples Federico II

Citations of this work

意識をめぐる新たな生物学的自然主義の可能性.小草 泰 & 新川 拓哉 - 2024 - Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 51 (1-2):115-135.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Facing up to the problem of consciousness.David Chalmers - 1995 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (3):200-19.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal questions. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 435 - 450.

View all 9 references / Add more references