Utility of Ethical Frameworks in Determining Behavioral Intention: A Comparison of the U.S. and Russia

Journal of Business Ethics 61 (3):235-247 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Using Reidenbach and Robin‘s ( Journal of Business Ethics 7, 871–879, 1988) multi-criteria ethics instrument, we carried out the first empirical test of Robertson and Crittenden‘s (Strategic Management Journal 24, 385–392, 2003) cross-cultural map of moral philosophies to examine what ethical criteria guide business people in Russia and the U.S. in their intention to behave. Competing divergence and convergence hypotheses were advanced. Our results support a convergence hypothesis, and reveal a common emphasis on relativism. Americans are also influenced by the justice criterion while Russians tend to emphasize utilitarianism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
61 (#270,814)

6 months
4 (#862,832)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Ethical Theory and Business.Tom L. Beauchamp, Norman E. Bowie & Denis Gordon Arnold (eds.) - 2008 - New York: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Business ethics: ethical decision making and cases.O. C. Ferrell - 2013 - Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. Edited by John Fraedrich & Linda Ferrell.
Ethical Theory and Business.T. L. Beauchamp & N. E. Bowie - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (11):846-880.

View all 8 references / Add more references