Quantified structures as barriers for LF movement

Natural Language Semantics 4 (1):1-56 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue for a restriction on certain types of LF movement, which I call ‘wh-related LF movement’. Evidence comes from a number of wh-in-situ constructions in German, such as the scope-marking construction and multiple questions. For semantic reasons, the in situ element in those constructions has to move at LF to either a position reserved for wh-phrases, or even higher up in the structure. The restriction (the Minimal Quantified Structure Constraint, MQSC) is that an intervening quantified expression blocks this movement. In the case of every, the MQSC leads to an unambiguously distributive interpretation of the question. In the case of all other intervening operators, including negation, it leads to ungrammaticality

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Typology of Wh-Questions.Lisa Lai Shen Cheng - 1991 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Chain Scope and Quantification Structure.Soowon Kim - 1991 - Dissertation, Brandeis University
The a/a-Bar Distinction and Movement Theory.Anoop Kumar Mahajan - 1990 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Against LF Pied-Piping.Arnim von Stechow - 1996 - Natural Language Semantics 4 (1):57-110.
Distributing arguments.Molly Diesing & Eloise Jelinek - 1995 - Natural Language Semantics 3 (2):123-176.
Clausal Pied-Piping.Karlos Arregi - 2003 - Natural Language Semantics 11 (2):115-143.
Generalized Quantifiers, Exception Phrases, and Logicality.Shalom Lappin - 1995 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 3 (2-3):203-222.
Wh-in-situ in the Framework of the Minimalist Program.Tanya Reinhart - 1998 - Natural Language Semantics 6 (1):29-56.
Intervention Effects Follow from Focus Interpretation.Sigrid Beck - 2006 - Natural Language Semantics 14 (1):1-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
69 (#242,601)

6 months
19 (#144,815)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A Flexible Approach to Exhaustivity in Questions.Sigrid Beck & Hotze Rullmann - 1999 - Natural Language Semantics 7 (3):249-298.
Superlative expressions, context, and focus.Yael Sharvit & Penka Stateva - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (4):453-504.
Three kinds of ellipsis: Syntactic, semantic, pragmatic?Jason Merchant - 2010 - In François Récanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftalí Villanueva (eds.), Context Dependence, Perspective and Relativity. Mouton de Gruyter.
Intervention Effects and Additivity.Clemens Mayr - 2014 - Journal of Semantics 31 (4):fft010.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Barriers.Noam Chomsky - 1986 - MIT Press.
Syntax and semantics of questions.Lauri Karttunen - 1977 - Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (1):3--44.
Questions in montague english.Charles L. Hamblin - 1973 - Foundations of Language 10 (1):41-53.
An investigation of the lumps of thought.Angelika Kratzer - 1989 - Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (5):607 - 653.

View all 14 references / Add more references