Intention, Teleology, and God

Dissertation, Syracuse University (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This dissertation involves the construction and evaluation of a teleological argument for God's existence. It is argued that purposive behavior ought to be determined by the mental states of intention. These intentional states must originate within a mind and the actions of an agent can reasonably be identified by others as exhibiting the qualities of being intentional. Criteria for determining the intentional nature of events are identified and their use justified as well as applied. The dissertation goes on to argue that the Universe exhibits intentional design in that it appears to be finely tuned to promote and sustain intelligent life. Applying the criteria of intention, it is argued that there is good inductive evidence for concluding the purposive nature of the Universe. ;The dissertation next examines the nature of an intending mind capable of creating such a finely tuned Universe. Ultimately it is concluded that the evidence is insufficient to conclude the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and wholly good God by means of a descriptivist's theory of reference. However, it is maintained that this teleological argument does adequately pick out the intending mind as God through direct reference vis-a-vis the believers experiences in religious community. To this extent the argument may confirm or uphold existing beliefs in God as well as provide collaborating support for other proofs for God's existence. In light of these results it is concluded that this teleological argument provides evidence for supporting belief in God's existence

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intention and teleology.Matthew Hanser - 1995 - Mind 107 (426):381-401.
Teleology.André Ariew - 2007 - In David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge University Press.
The Nature and Development of the Teleological Stance.Deborah Ann Kelemen - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Rational and Irrational Intentions: An Argument for Externalism.Wilhelm Vossenkuhl - 2002 - In Verena Mayer & Sabine A. Döring (eds.), Die Moralität der Gefühle. De Gruyter. pp. 163-174.
The intentional and the intended.J. L. A. Garcia - 1990 - Erkenntnis 33 (2):191 - 209.
Teleology Revived? Cooperation and the Ends of Nature.Simon Oliver - 2013 - Studies in Christian Ethics 26 (2):158-165.
God, fine-tuning, and the problem of old evidence.Bradley Monton - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):405-424.
Body‐intentionality.Corbin Collins - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (December):495-518.
Paley's Teleological Argument and Its Significance.Bill Spencer - 2006 - Dialogue: Journal of Phi Sigma Tau 48 (2-3):62 - 65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references