- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
It's Not Given Us to Foretell How Our Words Will Echo through the Ages: The Reception of Novel Ideas by Scientific Community
Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 13 (2):129-136 (2009)
Abstract
The paper reveals some mostly unnoticed and unexpected trends in reception of novel ideas in science. The author formulates certain principles of the reception of these ideas by scientific communities and justifies them by examples from modern mathematics and non-classical logicAuthor's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Ideas, Mental Faculties, and Method: The Logic of Ideas of Descartes and Locke and its Reception in the Dutch Republic.Paul Schuurman (ed.) - 2004 - Brill.
The German Hercules’s Heir: Pierre Gassendi’s Reception of Keplerian Ideas.Kuni Sakamoto - 2009 - Journal of the History of Ideas 70 (1):69-91.
Научный поиск как творческий процесс.Niginahon Shermuhamedova - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:367-375.
Mendeleev's discovery of the periodic law: The origin and the reception. [REVIEW]Masanori Kaji - 2003 - Foundations of Chemistry 5 (3):189-214.
Co-responsibility for research integrity.Carl Mitcham - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):273-290.
Book Reviews : Darwin and His Critics: The Reception of Darwin's Theory of Evolution by the Scientific Community. By DAVID L. HULL. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1973. Pp. xii + 473. $18.50. [REVIEW]J. O. Wisdom - 1976 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 6 (2):189-192.
The Impact of Aristotle’s Scientific Ideas in the Middle Ages and at the Beginning of the Scientific Revolution.Ingemar Düring - 1968 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 50 (1-2):115-133.
Similarities and varieties: A brief sketch on the reception of darwinism and sociobiology in japan. [REVIEW]Osamu Sakura - 1998 - Biology and Philosophy 13 (3):341-357.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-04-12
Downloads
39 (#399,999)
6 months
4 (#800,606)
2013-04-12
Downloads
39 (#399,999)
6 months
4 (#800,606)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Thinking About Contradictions: The Imaginary Logic of Nikolai Aleksandrovich Vasil’Ev.Venanzio Raspa - 2017 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
References found in this work
The Reception of Godel's Incompleteness Theorems.John W. Dawson - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:253 - 271.
The first axiomatization of relevant logic.Kosta Došen - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 21 (4):339 - 356.
The Scholar and the “Wolfhound Era”: The Fate of Ivan E. Orlov's Ideas in Logic, Philosophy, and Science.Valentin A. Bazhanov - 2003 - Science in Context 16 (4).
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo