The concept of 'competence' in medical ethics

Journal of Medical Ethics 6 (4):180-184 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dr Baumgarten analyses three possible justifications for doctors to decide that a patient is 'incompetent' to make or participate in medical decisions affecting him, and points out the difficulties of each. He argues that the degree to which a patient relinquishes control over decision-making which affects him will vary in different circumstances and should be explicitly agreed in the initial doctor-patient contract, rather as it often is when a client employs a professional to invest money on his behalf

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Three concepts of patient competence.Haavi Morreim - 1983 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 4 (3).
Conceptual competence.James Higginbotham - 1998 - Philosophical Issues 9:149-162.
Running Before We Can Walk: Do We Have the Capacity?Toby Williamson - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):147-150.
Depression and competence to refuse psychiatric treatment.A. Rudnick - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):151-155.
In the genes or in the stars? Children's competence to consent.P. Alderson - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (3):119-124.
Personality disorder and competence to refuse treatment.E. Winburn & R. Mullen - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):715-716.
Patient competence and surrogate decision making.Dan Brock - 2007 - In Rosamond Rhodes, Leslie Francis & Anita Silvers (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Medical Ethics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 128--140.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
26 (#604,926)

6 months
2 (#1,202,576)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?