Erroneous Expert Judgments

Journal of Scientific Exploration 26 (2) (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Editorial in JSE 26:1 suggests the need for a scientific analogue of Slonimsky’s one on erroneous and intemperate judgments in music (Lexicon of Musical Invective: Critical Assaults on Composers Since Beethoven’s Time). Something like that is already available in Cerf and Navasky’s The Experts Speak: The Definitive Compendium of Authoritative Misinformation (1984/1998) and Mission Accomplished! Or How We Won the War in Iraq: The Experts Speak (2008). Highly enjoyable.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Editorial.Stephen Braude - 2012 - Journal of Scientific Exploration 26 (1).
JSE 26:1 Spring 2012 WHOLE ISSUE.Stephen Braude - 2012 - Journal of Scientific Exploration 26 (1).
Pipefish or Pipe Dream?Paul H. LeBlond & Ed L. Bousfield - 2011 - Journal of Scientific Exploration 25 (4).
Challenging the Majority Rule in Matters of Truth.Bernd Lahno - 2014 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 7 (2):54-72.
Philosophical Expertise Put to the Test.Samuel Schindler & Pierre Saint-Germier - 2023 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 101 (3):592-608.
Cooperative Epistemic Trustworthiness.Marina DiMarco - forthcoming - Philosophy of Science:1-15.
Kudos for the Mindless Expert.Sebastian Benthall - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):65-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-16

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references