Prediction with expert advice applied to the problem of prediction with expert advice

Synthese 200 (4):1-24 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We often need to have beliefs about things on which we are not experts. Luckily, we often have access to expert judgements on such topics. But how should we form our beliefs on the basis of expert opinion when experts conflict in their judgments? This is the core of the novice/2-expert problem in social epistemology. A closely related question is important in the context of policy making: how should a policy maker use expert judgments when making policy in domains in which she is not herself an expert? This question is more complex, given the messy and strategic nature of politics. In this paper we argue that the prediction with expert advice framework from machine learning provides helpful tools for addressing these problems. We outline conditions under which we should expert PWEA to be helpful and those under which we should not expect these methods to perform well.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Assuming Access to Professional Advice.Claudia E. Haupt - 2021 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 49 (4):531-541.
Moral Expertise and the Credentials Problem.Michael Cholbi - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):323-334.
Problems with electoral evaluations of expert opinions.Roy A. Sorensen - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (1):47-53.
Moral Experts, Deference & Disagreement.Jonathan Matheson, Nathan Nobis & Scott McElreath - 2018 - In Nathan Nobis, Scott McElreath & Jonathan Matheson (eds.), Moral Expertise. Springer Verlag.
How to Identify Moral Experts.Amber Riaz - 2020 - The Journal of Ethics 25 (1):123-136.
How to Identify Moral Experts.Amber Riaz - 2020 - The Journal of Ethics 25 (1):123-136.
Scientific Expertise and Risk Aggregation.Thomas Boyer-Kassem - 2019 - Philosophy of Science 86 (1):124-144.
Local and global deference.J. Dmitri Gallow - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (9):2753-2770.
KBS for Banana Diagnosis and Treatment.Rafiq Madhoun - 2017 - International Journal of Academic Pedagogical Research (IJAPR) 2 (7):1-10.
Banana KBS Diagnosis and Treatment.Rafiq Madhoun - 2015 - International Journal of Academic Pedagogical Research (IJAPR) 2 (7):1-11.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-25

Downloads
68 (#231,141)

6 months
61 (#68,764)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Track Records: A Cautionary Tale.Alice C. W. Huang - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard J. Savage - 1954 - Wiley Publications in Statistics.
Group agency: the possibility, design, and status of corporate agents.Christian List & Philip Pettit - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Philip Pettit.
In Defence of Objective Bayesianism.Jon Williamson - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Decision Theory with a Human Face.Richard Bradley - 2017 - Cambridge University Press.
The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard J. Savage - 1954 - Synthese 11 (1):86-89.

View all 26 references / Add more references