- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Meaningful Residual Function, Permanence and Brain Death
American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):269-271 (2023)
Abstract
We share Nair-Collins and Joffe's (2023) concern with the accuracy of the “whole brain-death” diagnosis, which fails to take into account current understandings of residual brain function (neurohor...My notes
Similar books and articles
Maybe Whole-Brain Death Was Never the Point.Stephen S. Hanson - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):277-279.
The Brain-as-a-Whole Criterion and the Uniform Determination of Death Act.James L. Bernat - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):271-274.
Brain Death False Positives Reliably Track What Matters in Brain Death Cases.Eli Weber - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):285-286.
Certainty, Science, and the Brain-Based Definition of Death.Dominique E. Martin, Cynthia Forlini & Emma Tumilty - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):279-282.
Response to Commentaries: Frequent Preservation of Neurologic Function in Brain Death and Brainstem Death Entails False-Positive Misdiagnosis and Cerebral Perfusion.Ari R. Joffe & Michael Nair-Collins - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1).
Frequent Preservation of Neurologic Function in Brain Death and Brainstem Death Entails False-Positive Misdiagnosis and Cerebral Perfusion.Michael Nair-Collins & Ari R. Joffe - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):255-268.
The Indisputable Finality of Brain Death: Debunking Ambiguities and Reasserting a Fundamental Diagnosis.Ricardo Diaz Milian & Pablo Moreno Franco - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):274-276.
Defining Function in Medicine: Bridging the Gap between Biology and Clinical Practice.Alberto Molina-Pérez - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):282-285.
In Defense of Brain Death: Replies to Don Marquis, Michael Nair-Collins, Doyen Nguyen, and Laura Specker Sullivan.John P. Lizza - 2018 - Diametros 55:68-90.
Diagnosing death 50 years after the Harvard brain death report.Francis J. O’Keeffe & George L. Mendz - 2021 - The New Bioethics 27 (1):46-64.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-09-10
Downloads
18 (#828,363)
6 months
14 (#253,070)
2023-09-10
Downloads
18 (#828,363)
6 months
14 (#253,070)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Response to Commentaries: Frequent Preservation of Neurologic Function in Brain Death and Brainstem Death Entails False-Positive Misdiagnosis and Cerebral Perfusion.Ari R. Joffe & Michael Nair-Collins - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1).
References found in this work
Frequent Preservation of Neurologic Function in Brain Death and Brainstem Death Entails False-Positive Misdiagnosis and Cerebral Perfusion.Michael Nair-Collins & Ari R. Joffe - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):255-268.
The Dead Donor Rule, Reversibility and Donor Wishes.Stephen R. Latham & Ramesh K. Batra - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):31-32.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo