Assessing Expert Claims: Critical Thinking and the Appeal to Authority

Paideusis: Journal of the Canadian Philosophy of Education Society 6 (2):5-16 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments From Authority.Douglas Neil Walton - 1997 - University Park, PA, USA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Critical Thinking is Epistemically Responsible.Juho Ritola - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (5):659-678.
Speaking Truth to Conspiracy: Partisanship and Trust.Russell Muirhead & Nancy L. Rosenblum - 2016 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 28 (1):63-88.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-22

Downloads
9 (#1,252,744)

6 months
7 (#428,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Battersby
Capilano University

Citations of this work

Inquiry: A New Paradigm for Critical Thinking.Mark Battersby (ed.) - 2018 - Windsor, Canada: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Epistemic dependence.John Hardwig - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (7):335-349.
The recent development of informal logic.Ralph H. Johnson & J. Anthony Blair - forthcoming - Informal Logic: The First International Symposium.
Social Information.Keith Lehrer - 1977 - The Monist 60 (4):473-487.
Knowledge in its social setting.W. H. Walsh - 1971 - Mind 80 (319):321-336.

Add more references