You are simple

In Robert C. Koons & George Bealer (eds.), The waning of materialism. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 161--174 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that, unlike your brain, you are not composed of other things: you are simple. My argument centers on what I take to be an uncontroversial datum: for any pair of conscious beings, it is impossible for the pair itself to be conscious. Consider, for instance, the pair comprising you and me. You might pinch your arm and feel a pain. I might simultaneously pinch my arm and feel a qualitatively identical pain. But the pair we form would not feel a thing.1 Pairs of people themselves are incapable of experience. Call this The Datum. What explains The Datum? I think the following exhaust the reasonable options. (1) Pairs of people lack a sufficient number of immediate parts. (2) Pairs of people lack immediate parts capable of standing in the right sorts of relations to each other and their environment. (3) Pairs of people lack immediate parts of the right nature. (4) Pairs of people are not structures (they are unstructured collections of their two immediate parts). (5) Some combination of (1) – (4). Finally, (6) pairs of people are not simple.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

You Needn't Be Simple.Andrew M. Bailey - 2014 - Philosophical Papers 43 (2):145-160.
Persons, Simplicity, and Substance.Eric Yang - 2018 - Philosophical Papers 47 (2):299-311.
Consciousness and Topology.Eugene Mills - 2020 - Journal of Philosophical Research 45:189-195.
Stop Telling me What to Feel!Hanna Pickard - 2019 - Philosophical Topics 47 (2):1-25.
Counting on numbers.Peter Baumann - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):446-448.
Implementing Mathematical Objects in Set Theory.Thomas Forster - 2007 - Logique Et Analyse 50 (197):79-86.
Corrigendum: A logic for evidential support.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (4):352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
510 (#3,375)

6 months
101 (#168,804)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Panpsychism and Panprotopsychism.David Chalmers - 2013 - Amherst Lecture in Philosophy 8.
Animalism.Andrew M. Bailey - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (12):867-883.
Generic Animalism.Andrew M. Bailey & Peter van Elswyk - 2021 - Journal of Philosophy 118 (8):405-429.
A new puppet puzzle.Andrew M. Bailey & Joshua Rasmussen - 2020 - Philosophical Explorations 23 (3):202-213.

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Troubles with functionalism.Ned Block - 1978 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9:261-325.
Troubles with Functionalism.Ned Block - 1993 - In Alvin I. Goldman (ed.), Readings in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: MIT Press. pp. 231.
精神状态的性质.Hilary Putnam - 1967 - In William H. Capitan & Daniel Davy Merrill (eds.), Art, mind, and religion. [Pittsburgh]: University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 1--223.
The Emergent Self.William Hasker - 2001 - London: Cornell University Press.
Identity, Consciousness, and Value.Peter K. Unger - 1990 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references