The scientific reputation(s) of John Lubbock, Darwinian gentleman

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 95 (C):185-203 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.06.013

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Scientific realism: Darwinian smoke and platonic mirrors.Aharon Kantorovich - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (2):301-309.
The X Club: Power and Authority in Victorian Science, by Ruth Barton.Bill Jenkins - forthcoming - Intellectual History Review:1-2.
The triumph of the Darwinian method.Frank N. Egerton - 1971 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2 (3):281-286.
Why can't science be more like history: A response to Ruth Leys' The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique.Dr James Nikopoulos - forthcoming - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.
Revisiting darwinian teleology: A case for inclusive fitness as design explanation.Philippe Huneman - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 76:101188.
Extending and expanding the Darwinian synthesis: the role of complex systems dynamics.Bruce H. Weber - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (1):75-81.
Essay review: Why Can't Science Be More Like History: A Response to Ruth Leys' The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique. [REVIEW]Dr James Nikopoulos - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 75:57-61.
Two letters of Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kühn on a draft of the structure of scientific revolutions.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26 (3):353-387.
English engineer John Smeaton's experimental method(s): Optimisation, hypothesis testing and exploratory experimentation.Andrew M. A. Morris - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89 (C):283-294.
Ronald N. Giere and Richard S. Westfall, eds., "Foundations of Scientific Method: the Nineteenth Century". [REVIEW]P. M. Heimann - 1975 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 5 (4):397.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-09

Downloads
5 (#847,061)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Down under Darwin: Australasian perspectives on Darwin Studies.Ian Hesketh, Ruth Barton & Evelleen Richards - 2024 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 103 (C):69-76.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Joseph Dalton Hooker's Ideals for a Professional Man of Science.Richard Bellon - 2001 - Journal of the History of Biology 34 (1):51 - 82.

View all 9 references / Add more references