The dam project : who are the experts? : a philosophical lesson from the Vajont disaster

&
In Pierluigi Barrotta & Giovanni Scarafile (eds.), Science and democracy: controversies and conflicts. Philadelphia ;: John Benjamins (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Experts as non-experts: A case from SSC. [REVIEW]Hironori Ayabe - 1999 - AI and Society 13 (1-2):63-68.
Project activity of students in music lesson.Karimova Dildora Anvarovna, Ibrakhimjanova Gavhar Amanbaevna & Salimova Dilafruz Ibragimovna - unknown
Experts, Public Policy and the Question of Trust.Maria Baghramian & Michel Croce - 2021 - In Michael Hannon & Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology. New York: Routledge.
Feyerabend's democratic critique of expertise.Evan M. Selinger - 2003 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (3-4):359-373.
Experts: What they are and how we recognize them—a discussion of Alvin goldman’s views.Oliver R. Scholz - 2009 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):187-205.
Ethical challenges for the design and conduct of mega-biobanking from Great East Japan Earthquake victims.Kenji Matsui & Shimon Tashiro - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):55.
Expert testimony and epistemological free-riding: The mmr controversy.Stephen John - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):496-517.
The Trouble with Experts.Paul J. Quirk - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (4):449-465.
The trouble with experts.Paul J. Quirk - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (4):449-465.
Translation Terrain and Pied Piper Detour: How Experts Eliminated a Norwegian Digital City Project.Jarle Brosveet - 2004 - Science, Technology and Human Values 29 (2):213-241.
Three Nuclear Disasters and a Hurricane : Some Reflections on Engineering Ethics.Michael Davis - 2012 - Journal of Applied Ethics and Philosophy 4:1-10.
Epistemic authority and rhetorical strategies in crisis circumstances.Ljiljana Radenović & Petar Nurkić - 2021 - In Nenad Cekić (ed.), Етика и истина у доба кризе. Belgrade: pp. 153-180.
The Disaster Experts: Mastering Risk in Modern America. [REVIEW]Gabrielle Hecht - 2012 - Isis 103:771-772.
Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw: Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability – Towards a foundation of bioethics and biolaw.Jacob Dahl Rendtorff - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (3):235-244.
Að treysta sérfræðingum [English: "Trusting Experts: What, When, and Why?"].Finnur Dellsén - 2020 - Ritið 20 (3):235-258.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-07

Downloads
1 (#1,893,477)

6 months
1 (#1,498,742)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Pierluigi Barrotta
University of Pisa
Eleonora Montuschi
University of Venice

Citations of this work

Public engagement and argumentation in science.Silvia Ivani & Catarina Dutilh Novaes - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (3):1-29.
Emotions and Distrust in Science.Katherine Furman - 2020 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 28 (5):713-730.
X—Why Trust Science? Reliability, Particularity and the Tangle of Science.Nancy Cartwright - 2021 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 120 (3):237-252.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references