Experts: What they are and how we recognize them—a discussion of Alvin goldman’s views

Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):187-205 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What are experts? Are there only experts in a subjective sense or are there also experts in an objective sense? And how, if at all, may non-experts recognize experts in an objective sense? In this paper, I approach these important questions by discussing Alvin I. Goldman's thoughts about how to define objective epistemic authority and about how non-experts are able to identify experts. I argue that a multiple epistemic desiderata approach is superior to Goldman's purely veritistic approach.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,895

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Experts: What are they and how can laypeople identify them?Thomas Grundmann - 2025 - In Jennifer Lackey & Aidan McGlynn, Oxford Handbook of Social Epistemology. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press.
Expertise and authority.Coran Stewart - 2020 - Episteme 17 (4):420-437.
When experts disagree.David Coady - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):68-79.
Epistemic authority and rhetorical strategies in crisis circumstances.Ljiljana Radenović & Petar Nurkić - 2021 - In Nenad Cekić, Етика и истина у доба кризе. Belgrade: University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy. pp. 153-180.
Epistemic Trust in Scientific Experts: A Moral Dimension.George Kwasi Barimah - 2024 - Science and Engineering Ethics 30 (3):1-21.
Should we worry about conspiracy theorists rejecting experts?Melina Tsapos - 2024 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 67:1-21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-01-16

Downloads
315 (#97,921)

6 months
34 (#123,871)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Oliver R. Scholz
University of Münster

Citations of this work

On What it Takes to be an Expert.Michel Croce - 2019 - Philosophical Quarterly 69 (274):1-21.
When Expert Disagreement Supports the Consensus.Finnur Dellsén - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (1):142-156.
Experts: What are they and how can laypeople identify them?Thomas Grundmann - 2025 - In Jennifer Lackey & Aidan McGlynn, Oxford Handbook of Social Epistemology. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press.
Consensus versus Unanimity: Which Carries More Weight?Finnur Dellsén - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references