Experts: What they are and how we recognize them—a discussion of Alvin goldman’s views

Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):187-205 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What are experts? Are there only experts in a subjective sense or are there also experts in an objective sense? And how, if at all, may non-experts recognize experts in an objective sense? In this paper, I approach these important questions by discussing Alvin I. Goldman's thoughts about how to define objective epistemic authority and about how non-experts are able to identify experts. I argue that a multiple epistemic desiderata approach is superior to Goldman's purely veritistic approach.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Expert judgement and expert disagreement.Jeryl L. Mumpower & Thomas R. Stewart - 1996 - Thinking and Reasoning 2 (2 & 3):191 – 212.
Experts: Which ones should you trust?Alvin I. Goldman - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):85-110.
Are moral philosophers moral experts?Bernward Gesang - 2008 - Bioethics 24 (4):153-159.
What is an expert?Bruce D. Weinstein - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (1).
When experts disagree.David Coady - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):68-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-01-16

Downloads
258 (#74,854)

6 months
17 (#132,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Oliver R. Scholz
University of Münster

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references