Reply to Brereton

&
Film-Philosophy 4 (1) (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pat Brereton 'The Audience as Reader is Seldom Caught in the Act?' _Film-Philosophy_, vol. 4 no. 26, November 2000

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3366/film.2000.0026

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Audience as Reader is Seldom Caught in the Act?Pat Brereton - 2000 - Film-Philosophy 4 (1).
Reply to Wood.Silvio Gaggi - 2000 - Film-Philosophy 4 (1).
The Stream of Consciousness: A Reply to Debaise.Haim Callev - 2000 - Film-Philosophy 4 (1).
Pictures and Film; Philosophy and the Empirical Disciplines: A Reply to Dean.Robert Hopkins - 1999 - Film-Philosophy 3 (1).
Reply to Longacre.Scott McQuire - 2002 - Film-Philosophy 6 (3).
Reply to MacKinnon and Sorfa.Laura Mulvey - 2001 - Film-Philosophy 5 (1).
A Reply to Mogg and Chopra-Gant.Deborah Thomas - 2003 - Film-Philosophy 7 (1).
Rethinking Renoir, a reply to Michael Abecassis.Martin O'Shaughnessy - 2004 - Film-Philosophy 8 (1).
Fugitive Spaces -- Between the Critical and the Creative: A Reply to Amy Herzog.Barbara M. Kennedy - 2001 - Film-Philosophy 5 (2).
La Longue durée: A Reply to Joseph Nechvatal.Dorothea Olkowski - 2001 - Film-Philosophy 5 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
3 (#1,729,579)

6 months
26 (#116,274)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references