Radical Science

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):18-33 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The authors identify several types of the new forms of protestmovement that are discusses within the problems of autonomy ofscientific system and the protection of the interests of scientists. They argue that the this type of communication shows how it is possible to combine both cognitive and normative attitude of science. The authors show the mechanisms of the reproduction of this communication and argue that it gradually turns into communicative macro system. The authors conclude that the protest movement in science could be considered as a practical resolution of the Merton – Popper paradox, which presumes the incompatibility of both cognitive attitude (impartial observation) and normative dimension (value production) of science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Whewell vs Comte.Alexander Yu Antonovski & Raisa E. Barash - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 54 (4):202-208.
Constructing a Philosophy of Science of Cognitive Science.William Bechtel - 2009 - Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (3):548-569.
Evolutionary approach to the development of science.Alexander Antonovski - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):201-214.
The Contingency of Science and the Future of Philosophy.Ian James Kidd - 2011 - In Eric Dietrich & Zach Weber (eds.), Essays in Philosophy. pp. 312--328.
Filosofía de la ciencia e historia de la ciencia.Valeriano Iranzo - 2005 - Quaderns De Filosofia I Ciència 35:19-43.
The Part of Cognitive Science That Is Philosophy.Daniel C. Dennett - 2009 - Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (2):231--236.
Introduction: Philosophy and Cognitive Science.Richard Samuels, Eric Margolis & Stephen Stich - 2012 - In Eric Margolis, Richard Samuels & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 3-18.
Contextualism in philosophy of science.Vladimir N. Porus - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):75-93.
Merton-Popper’s paradox and the substantive rationality of science.Liana A. Tukhvatulina - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):49-52.
On the Critique of Protest. Reply to critics.Alexander A. Antonovski - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):53-58.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-16

Downloads
10 (#1,186,283)

6 months
3 (#967,057)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references