Robust communications or incivility – where do we draw the line?

Legal Ethics 18 (1):1-23 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTCivility has long been considered a core value of lawyering. For some time, concern has been expressed in the literature about the loss of civility in the legal profession, and regulators and professional associations have sought to foster civility and to discourage, and in some cases, penalise, incivility. In particular, instances of incivility or discourteousness are increasingly linked to questions of misconduct. However, the notion of ‘civility’ is itself, often contentious, and the line between ‘robust' communication and incivility is unclear.Does civility matter? If so, when will lawyer advocacy on behalf of the client, or their strongly worded criticisms of an opponent's actions, become the subject of claims of unethical behaviour?Arguing that civility is important, this article will analyse relevant case law from Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada and New Zealand, in order to better understand contemporary conceptions of civility and to draw out principles currently b..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-30

Downloads
32 (#127,447)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references