Philosophy in Stan Brakhage’s Dog Star Man: World, Metaphor, Interpretation

Cham: Springer Verlag (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book shows how a masterpiece of experimental cinema can be interpreted through hermeneutics of the film world. As an application of Ricœurian methodology to a non-narrative film, the book calls into question the fundamental concept of the film world. Firmly rooted within the context of experimental cinema, Stan Brakhage’s Dog Star Man was not created on the basis of a narrative structure and representation of characters, places and events, but on very different presuppositions. The techniques with which Brakhage worked on celluloid and used frames as canvases, as well as his choice to make the film without dialogue and sound, exhort the interpreter to directly question the philosophical language of moving images.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Essential Brakhage: selected writings on filmmaking.Stan Brakhage - 2001 - Kingston, N.Y.: Documentext. Edited by Bruce R. McPherson.
The Analogical Meaning of Paul Ricoeur's Metaphor.Yating Nie - 2000 - Philosophy and Culture 27 (8):796-804.
A Re-interpretation Of Plato's Allegory Of The Cave.Mei-mao Lin - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 3:97-102.
What Is Said by Metaphor.Hsiu-lin Ku - 2014 - Soochow Journal of Philosophical Studies 30:35-53.
Objects of metaphor.Samuel D. Guttenplan - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-31

Downloads
7 (#1,385,962)

6 months
4 (#787,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references