Identity in Frege’s Begriffsschrift: Where Both Thau-Caplan and Heck Are Wrong

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (3):355-370 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Frege’s views on identity continue to provoke scholars, and rightly so. In particular his view in Begriffsschrift of 1879, and its relation to his view in ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’ of 1892 deserve careful attention. The issues involved have a wider significance than Frege’s specific views on identity in different periods, though these are important enough. They concern also the move from what I call below ‘thin’ semantics, which is exhausted in signs being assigned content, to a ‘thick’ semantics, in which ‘modes of determining their content’, or Sinne are also concerned.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Frege’s Theory of Identity is Not.Robert May - 2012 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):41-48.
Frege on identities.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 2000 - History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (3):195-205.
Frege on identity statements.Robert May - 2001 - In C. Cecchetto, G. Chierchia & M. T. Guasti (eds.), Semantic Interfaces: Reference, Anaphora, and Aspect. CSLI Publications. pp. 1-51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
146 (#128,010)

6 months
24 (#116,337)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

What's Puzzling Gottlob Frege?Mike Thau & Ben Caplan - 2001 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (2):159-200.
Frege : Logical Excavations.G. Baker & P. Hacker - 1984 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 49 (2):324-325.

View all 15 references / Add more references