A prerequisite for rational philosophical discussion

Synthese 12 (4):328 - 332 (1960)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00485420

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Can indexical sentences stand in logical relations?Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1963 - Philosophical Studies 14 (6):87 - 90.
Discussion of Bruno de finetti's paper 'initial probabilities: A prerequisite for any valid induction'.I. J. Good - 1969 - Synthese 20 (1):17 - 24.
Rational intuition: Bealer on its nature and epistemic status.Ernest Sosa - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 81 (2-3):151--162.
Free your mind.John Skorupski - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 46 (46):59-64.
A note on state-descriptions.Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1951 - Philosophical Studies 2 (5):72-75.
Comments on logical form.Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1951 - Philosophical Studies 2 (2):26-29.
On lalic implication and the cogito.Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1960 - Philosophical Studies 11 (1-2):23 - 25.
More on sentences, statements, the cogito, and the liar.Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1968 - Philosophical Studies 19 (4):55 - 57.
Commensurability as a Prerequisite of Rational Choice: An Examination of Sidgwick's Position.Henry S. Richardson - 1991 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (2):181 - 197.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
46 (#342,578)

6 months
1 (#1,479,630)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How rational can a polemic across the analytic -continental 'divide' be?Marcelo Dascal - 2001 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3):313 – 339.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references