Transformation of the Constitutional System of the Slovak Republic

Creative and Knowledge Society 1 (2):70-82 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Transformation of the Constitutional System of the Slovak Republic Purpose of the article is to analyze the Constitutional Act No. 356/2011 Z. Coll. amending the Constitution of the Slovak Republic in terms of its compatibility of the constitutional system of the Slovak Republic. The article analyzes the potential impact of amendment to the Constitution of the Slovak Republic on the Parliamentary form of the government of the Slovak Republic and examine the consistency of Art. 115 Para 3 of the Constitution of the Slovak Republic with another provisions that relate to it. The purpose of the article is to identify some problems that brought amendment to the Constitution of the Slovak Republic by the Constitutional Act No. 356/2011 Coll. of Art. 115 Para 3 and points out its incompatibility with the constitutional text. This article also discusses a possible shift in the parliamentary constitutional system of the Slovak Republic which the Constitutional Act brought.Methodology/methods used in the article is the analysis of the Constitutional Act No. 356/2011coll. by induction from the concrete wording of Art. 115 Para 3 of the Constitution of the Slovak Republic to the conclusions in relation to the entire text of the Constitution of the Slovak Republic and to the whole constitutional system of the Slovak Republic Scientific aim is to point to the shortcomings of the Constitutional Act No. 356/2011 Z. Coll., not only from the perspective of constitutional interpretation, but potentially also in terms of practice and also show the wrong trend of breaking the internal unity and coherence of the constitutional system of the Slovak Republic by half-baked changes to the text of the Constitution of the Slovak Republic Findings are specific and severe systemic disorders that brought the amendment to the Constitution of the Slovak Republic by the Constitutional Act No. 356/2011 Coll. of Art. 115 Para 3. The Article identifies three concrete problems and the subsequent practice may bring some other issues that were not known at the time of processing of this Article Conclusions are directed to the fact, that the Constitutional Act No. 356/2011 Coll. means internal disturbance of the constitutional system of the Slovak Republic, brings more problems than constructive solutions and potentially deflects the parliamentary constitutional system of the Slovak Republic to the semi-presidential.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Asylum Legal Framework and Policy of the Slovak Republic.Lucia Hurná - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (4):1383-1405.
Implementation Of Patients' Rights In The Slovak Republic.Alexandra Brasinov, Em'lia Jansk & Richard Jurkovi - 2004 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 14 (3):90-91.
Toward a Democratic Rule of Law.Stephen L. Esquith - 1999 - Political Theory 27 (3):334-356.
The Problems of Correction of the Official Constitutional Doctrine.Egidijus Jarašiūnas - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 115 (1):39-70.
Constitutional thought in the late Roman republic.Benjamin Straumann - 2011 - History of Political Thought 32 (2):280-292.
The Constitutional Foundations of the Financial System of the State of Lithuania.Dalia Vasarienė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (3):987-1003.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-12

Downloads
12 (#1,068,950)

6 months
3 (#987,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references