Hegel and the Question of Method

Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study attempts a critical appropriation of Hegel's philosophy from the standpoint of a question which is both integral to and yet transcends that philosophy. The question of method is concerned with the possibility of developing a comprehensive knowledge of the phenomenon of "knowing". If found, then such a knowledge would capture the essence of what it means to seek the truth within a set of regulative principles which are valid for all inquiry, irrespective of differing perspectives and interests. ;I argue that the quest for this universal method of knowing, although it began properly with Descartes, reached a certain level of completeness within Hegel. Rather than relying upon a static and a-historical foundation for method, Hegel replaced the concept of the cogito with a dynamic and fully historical meaning for self-consciousness. Through an examination of such works as The Lectures on the History of Philosophy, and The Phenomenology of Spirit, I argue that Hegel developed a concept of universal method which remains fully concrete within experience. ;In addition to defending the theory of philosophical method which Hegel provides within these works, a criticism of Hegel will be developed which calls into question the fundamental role which he intended The Science of Logic to play within his overall conception of method. I argue that Hegel's mistake was to presuppose that totality and intelligibility have the same referent. Thus he thought it possible to produce a knowledge of knowing and a concept of method which could subsume completely the origins of method within individual certainty. However, in giving up this origin Hegel's methods became abstract. ;I conclude that Hegel's concept of universal method need not rely upon the presupposition that totality and intelligibility have the same referent; and, if it is rejected, Hegel's concept of method can be saved from the abstractness it acquired when he subordinated individual certainty to the quest for a comprehensive system of philosophy. My criticism of Hegel has as its goal to separate system and method in such a way that a form of absoluteness becomes possible which not only allows for but insists upon the irreducible autonomy of individual certainty

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references