Autonomy and informational privacy, or gossip: The central meaning of the first amendment

Social Philosophy and Policy 21 (2):215-268 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX


My thesis is simple. The right of informational privacy, the great modern achievement often attributed to the classic Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis article, “The Right to Privacy” , asserts an individual's right not to have private personal information circulated. Warren and Brandeis claimed that individual dignity in a modern society requires that people be able to keep their private lives to themselves and proposed that the common law should be understood to protect this dignity by making dissemination of private information a tort. As broadly stated, this right not to have private information distributed directly conflicts with a broadly conceived freedom of speech and of the press. My claim is that, in cases of conflict, the law should reject the Warren and Brandeis innovation. Speech and press freedom should prevail; the privacy tort should be ignored. This conclusion requires a normative argument concerning the appropriate basis and status of speech freedom that this essay will not really provide but for which I have argued elsewhere. Here, instead, I will describe that theory of speech freedom, explore its implications for informational privacy, and finally suggest some reasons to think that rejection of the privacy tort should not be so troubling and is, in fact, pragmatically desirable



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,517

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Privacy and autonomy: From Warren and brandeis to Roe and Cruzan.Thomas Halper - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):121-135.
Free speech, privacy, and autonomy.Adam D. Moore - 2020 - Social Philosophy and Policy 37 (2):31-51.
Privacy as Informational Commodity.Jarek Gryz - 2013 - Proceedings of IACAP Conference.
Privacy and Democracy.Paul Voice - 2016 - South African Journal of Philosophy 35 (3):1-9.
privacy, democracy and freedom of expression.Annabelle Lever - 2015 - In Beate Roessler & Dorota Mokrosinska (eds.), The Social Dimensions of Privacy. Cambridge University Press.
Privacy and Assurance: On the Right to Be Forgotten.Scott Casleton - 2024 - Political Philosophy 1 (1):212-235.
Rethinking the concept of the right to information privacy: a Japanese perspective.Kiyoshi Murata & Yohko Orito - 2008 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 6 (3):233-245.


Added to PP

80 (#206,552)

6 months
17 (#205,018)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Gossip and Social Punishment.Linda Radzik - 2016 - Res Philosophica 93 (1):185-204.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references