Designing spheres of informational justice

Ethics and Information Technology 11 (3):175-179 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

J. van den Hoven suggested to analyse privacy from the perspective of informational justice, whereby he referred to the concept of distributive justice presented by M. Walzer in “ Spheres of Justice ”. In “privacy as contextual integrity” Helen Nissenbaum did also point to Walzer’s approach of complex equality as well to van den Hoven’s concept. In this article I will analyse the challenges of applying Walzer’s concept to issues of informational privacy. I will also discuss the possibilities of framing privacy from the point of the “art of separation” by looking at the intersection of information infrastructures and institutions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,599

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.
Introduction.David Miller - 1995 - In David Miller & Michael Walzer, Pluralism, Justice, and Equality. Oxford University Press.
Michael Walzer’s Republican Theory of Distributive Justice.Manuel Knoll - 2019 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):81-98.
Complex Equality.David Miller - 1995 - In David Miller & Michael Walzer, Pluralism, Justice, and Equality. Oxford University Press.
The ontological interpretation of informational privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):185–200.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-07-18

Downloads
117 (#200,221)

6 months
20 (#180,131)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?