Confirmation and probability: A reply to settle

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22 (3):285-286 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

That confirmation may yet be a probability.Patricia Baillie - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (1):41-51.
The paradoxes of confirmation—a reply to dr Agassi.H. G. Alexander - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):229-234.
Confirmation as a probability: Dead but it won't lie down!T. W. Settle - 1970 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21 (2):200-201.
Further comments on probability and confirmation: A rejoinder to professor Popper.Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1956 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (27):245-248.
‘Content’ and ‘Degree of Confirmation’: A Reply to Dr Bar-Hillel.Karl R. Popper - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (22):157-163.
"Natural Science and the Spiritual Life." By John Baillie.A. C. Crombie - 1952 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 ([9/12]):210.
Propensity theories of probability unscathed: A reply to white.Tom Settle - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (4):331-335.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
104 (#51,678)

6 months
4 (#1,635,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references