The paradoxes of confirmation—a reply to dr Agassi

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):229-234 (1959)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/x.39.229

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Alexander H. G.. The paradoxes of confirmation. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 9 , pp. 227–233.Agassi J.. Corroboration versus induction. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 9 , pp. 311–317.Alexander H. G.. The paradoxes of confirmation—a reply to Dr. Agassi. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 10 , pp. 229–234.Watkins J. W. N.. Confirmation without background knowledge. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 10 , pp. 318–320. [REVIEW]David Kaplan - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (2):249-250.
‘Content’ and ‘Degree of Confirmation’: A Reply to Dr Bar-Hillel.Karl R. Popper - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (22):157-163.
Yehoshua Bar-Hillel. Comments on ‘Degree of confirmation’ by Professor K. R. Popper. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , pp. 155–157. - Karl R. Popper. ‘Content’ and ‘degree of confirmation’: A reply to Dr Bar-Hillel. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , pp. 157–163. - Rudolf Carnap. Remarks on Popper's note on content and degree of confirmation. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 243–244. - K. R. Popper. Reply to Professor Carnap. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 244–245. - Y. Bar-Hillel. Further comments on probability and confirmation. A rejoinder to Professor Popper. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 245–248. - K.R.Popper. Adequacy and consistency: A second reply to Dr Bar-Hillel. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 249–256. - Peter Achinstein. The identity hypothesis. The British Journal for the philosophy of science,. [REVIEW]Harry V. Stopes-Roe - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1):142-146.
Reply to dr H. A. C. Dobbs.Ninian Marshall - 1961 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 12 (45):68-70.
Reply to Agassi and Berkson.L. Pearce Williams - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (3):252.
The paradoxes of confirmation.H. G. Alexander - 1958 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 (35):227-233.
Baumer on the confirmation paradoxes.Howard Kahane - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (1):52-56.
Confirmation without paradoxes.William M. Baumer - 1964 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15:177.
Confirmation without paradoxes.William H. Baumer - 1964 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15 (59):177-195.
Eliminative confirmation and paradoxes.Howard Kahane - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (2):160-162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
98 (#173,749)

6 months
3 (#1,207,367)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references