Change in view: sensitivity to facts in prospective rationality

In Giancarlo Marchetti, Hilary Putnam, Donald Davidson, Sharyn Clough & Ruth Anna Putnam (eds.), La contingenza dei fatti e l'oggettivita dei valori. Sesto San Giovanni, Milano: Mimesis. pp. 137-158 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter, I offer a constructivist account of practical reasoning as both generative and transformative in response to calls from philosophers as diverse as Iris Murdoch and Gilbert Harman, who have urged the development of a more nuanced picture of reasoning that incorporates revisionary and revelatory changes in viewpoint. Within this context, I describe sensitivity to facts as a form of emotional engagement that is also partially constitutive of facts. I consider both the epistemological and ontological aspects of this claim. From an epistemological point of view, my claim is that agents strengthen their discernment of relevant facts through emotional engagement. From an ontological point of view, my claim is that, through emotional engagement, agents alter their immediate relationship to objects, changing not only “what matters” but also the “facts of the matter”. To an important extent, then, facts are inseparable from the subjective concerns of the agent. This is not to say that there are no subject-independent facts of the matter, nor that objects are mere projections of an agent’s sensibility onto the cold, colorless canvass of valueless reality. Rather, my claim is that the ontological boundary between facts and values—and the normative status of facts—are both internal to the practical perspective, defined by an agent’s particular concerns and within shared practices of mutual recognition. The most relevant implications of the constructivist view are found at the level of prospective rationality, that is, within the temporal dimension of rationality. Emotional engagement fosters changes in perspective, but this should not be read as simply arbitrary fluctuations. Despite being perspectival, such changes are applied to a subject-independent field, which gains further intelligibility through the agent’s altered relationship to those circumstances. By examining the dynamics of such changes, we acquire a more nuanced theoretical vocabulary to help make sense of the prospective dimension of practical reasoning within which ordinary agents are engaged.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Being Realistic About Reasons.Thomas Scanlon - 2014 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Internalism and Rational Choice.William Albert Wright - 1988 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The structure of instrumental practical reasoning.Christian Miller - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (1):1–40.
A Practical View of Law.Yongliu Zheng - 2009 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 95 (2):274-295.
Collingwood, psychologism and internalism.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2004 - European Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):163–177.
Just the facts, and only the facts, about human rationality?Jeffrey Foss - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):254-255.
Subjective experience and points of view.Robert M. Francescotti - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:25-36.
Making of the Theory of Social Fact.V. ?erník - 2008 - Filozofia 63:670-682.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-12

Downloads
4 (#1,604,214)

6 months
1 (#1,506,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carla Bagnoli
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

Citations of this work

Liberal Naturalism and Non-epistemic Values.Ricardo F. Crespo - 2019 - Foundations of Science 24 (2):247-273.
Putnam’s Alethic Pluralism and the Fact-Value Dichotomy.Pietro Salis - 2021 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 13 (2):1-16.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references