There Are No Genuine Disagreements about Funniness

Stance 8:29-37 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that there are no genuine disagreements about whether something is funny. My argument rests largely on the premise that something is funny only if someone experiences it as funny. The bulk of this paper is spent supporting this premise, primarily through an analysis of the meaning of “funniness.” The rest of the paper is spent demonstrating how my conclusion follows from this premise.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Humour is a Funny Thing.Alan Roberts - 2016 - British Journal of Aesthetics 56 (4):355-366.
What's wrong with Moore's argument?James Pryor - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349–378.
Common ground and grounds of law.Marat Shardimgaliev - 2020 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 45 (1):2-26.
Why 30 Rock Is Not Funny.Josh Gillon - 2011 - Philosophy and Literature 35 (2):320-337.
The Modal Argument is Not Circular.Richard Swinburne - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (3):371-372.
Non-symmetric Relations.Cian Dorr - 2004 - In Dean W. Zimmerman (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics Volume 1. Oxford University Press. pp. 155-92.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
11 (#1,149,542)

6 months
7 (#592,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references