There Are No Genuine Disagreements about Funniness

Stance 8:29-37 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that there are no genuine disagreements about whether something is funny. My argument rests largely on the premise that something is funny only if someone experiences it as funny. The bulk of this paper is spent supporting this premise, primarily through an analysis of the meaning of “funniness.” The rest of the paper is spent demonstrating how my conclusion follows from this premise.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Humour is a Funny Thing.Alan Roberts - 2016 - British Journal of Aesthetics 56 (4):355-366.
Fact-Dependent Policy Disagreements and Political Legitimacy.Klemens Kappel - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (2):313-331.
Why 30 Rock Is Not Funny.Josh Gillon - 2011 - Philosophy and Literature 35 (2):320-337.
Utopias and the Art of the Possible.Timothy Chappell - 2008 - Analyse & Kritik 30 (1):179-203.
Human constructions.Michael Frayn - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 47 (47):120-126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
9 (#1,232,561)

6 months
5 (#633,186)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references