Friendship and Commercial Societies

Politics, Philosophy and Economics (No. 3):301-326 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Critics of commercial societies complain that the free-market system of property rights and freedom of contract tends to commodify relationships and erode the bonds of personal and civic friendship. I argue that this thesis rests on a misunderstanding of both markets and friendship. As voluntary, reciprocal relationships, market relationships and friendship share important properties. So-called market norms, such as instrumentality and fungibility, come in varying degrees and characterize not only market, but also non-market, relationships, including friendship. Further, although market relationships are primarily instrumental, the individuals involved are not. Both the virtues of markets and their vices have their counterparts in friendship. Like all relations and activities that exercise important human capacities and play an important role in a meaningful life, market relations and activities are essentially structured and supported by ethical norms and, in turn, support these norms. For these and other reasons, market societies are not only not inimical to friendship, they create a more secure matrix for civic and personal friendship, as well as for other important values like art, science, or philosophy, than any other developed form of society.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Friendship and commercial societies.Neera K. Badhwar - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (3):301-326.
After Philia? Friendship, the Market, and Late Modernity.Lawrence Quill - 2009 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 16 (2):32-43.
Friendship: a philosophical reader.Neera Kapur Badhwar (ed.) - 1993 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Gilles Deleuze's ABCs: the folds of friendship.Charles J. Stivale - 2008 - Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Friendship and moral danger.Dean Cocking & Jeanette Kennett - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (5):278-296.
The Advantages of Civic Friendship.Joyce L. Jenkins - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24:459-471.
Friendship and the self.Dean Cocking & Jeanette Kennett - 1998 - Ethics 108 (3):502-527.
Rethinking Confucian Friendship.Xiufen Lu - 2010 - Asian Philosophy 20 (3):225-245.
The circumstances of justice: Pluralism, community, and friendship.Neera Kapur Badhwar - 1993 - Journal of Political Philosophy 1 (3):250–276.
Civic Friendship and Thin Citizenship.R. K. Bentley - 2013 - Res Publica 19 (1):5-19.
Philosophy at the Core of Economic Markets.Karl Reinhard Kolmsee - 2000 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (4):75-78.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
123 (#146,851)

6 months
58 (#79,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Neera K. Badhwar
University of Oklahoma

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Atomism.Charles Taylor - 1979 - In Alkis Kontos (ed.), Powers, Possessions, and Freedom: Essays in Honour of C.B. Macpherson. University of Toronto Press.
On civic friendship.Sibyl A. Schwarzenbach - 1996 - Ethics 107 (1):97-128.
The circumstances of justice: Pluralism, community, and friendship.Neera Kapur Badhwar - 1993 - Journal of Political Philosophy 1 (3):250–276.

Add more references