Ambiguous Legacy: The Social Construction of the Kuhnian Revolution and Its Consequences for the Sociology of Science

Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 20 (2):139-155 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, the impact of Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions on the sociology of science is evaluated. The main argument is that a questionable construction of Kuhn’s work heralded the constructivist revolution that ultimately contributed to the division between sociology of science and sociology of scientific knowledge. A reorientation of sociology of science that combines institutional and constructivist perspectives is advocated.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/027046760002000208

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Sociology as a source of anomaly in Thomas Kuhn's system of science.Struan Jacobs & Brian Mooney - 1997 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (4):466-485.
Sociology as a Serious Source of Anomaly in Thomas Kuhn's System of Science.Struan Jacobs & T. Brian Mooney - unknown
Kuhn and the History of Science.K. Brad Wray - 2019 - In Miranda Fricker, Peter Graham, David Henderson & Nikolaj Jang Pedersen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 40-48.
An introduction to science and technology studies.Sergio Sismondo - 2004 - Malden, MA: Blackwell.
The Interrelations between the Philosophy, History and Sociology of Science in Thomas Kuhn‘s Theory of Scientific Development.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (4):487-501.
The taming of science and technology studies.Zaheer Baber - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (2 & 3):95 – 98.
Kuhn’s Social Epistemology and the Sociology of Science.K. Brad Wray - 2015 - In Kuhn’s Social Epistemology and the Sociology of Science. Cham: Springer Verlag.
The Structure’s Legacy: Not from Philosophy to Description.Vasso Kindi - 2012 - Topoi 32 (1):81-89.
Kuhn’s Social Epistemology and the Sociology of Science.K. Brad Wray - 2015 - In William J. Devlin & Alisa Bokulich (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On. Cham: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 311. Springer. pp. 167-183.
Science made up: Constructivist sociology of scientific knowledge.Arthur Fine - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-27

Downloads
11 (#1,146,652)

6 months
5 (#836,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.Richard Rorty - 1979 - Princeton University Press.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
Knowledge and social imagery.David Bloor - 1976 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

View all 40 references / Add more references