The Posthuman as Hollow Idol: A Nietzschean Critique of Human Enhancement

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42 (3):304-327 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, the author aims to show that transhumanists are confused about their own conception of the posthuman: transhumanists anticipate radical transformation of the human through technology and at the same time assume that the criteria to determine what is “normal” and what is “enhanced” are univocal, both in our present time and in the future. Inspired by Nietzsche’s notion of the Overhuman, the author argues that the slightest “historical and phenomenological sense” discloses copious variations of criteria, both diachronic and synchronic, for what can be considered “normal” and “enhanced.” Radical transformation through technology does not simply enable us to become “stronger,” “smarter,” or “healthier,” but it can and often will also change the very standard or yardstick with which we measure what counts as “stronger,” “smarter,” or “healthier.” Put yet differently: new and emerging technologies are not neutral means but often bring about different and, from our current perspective, foreign standards for determining what are “normal” and “enhanced” capacities. Since the qualitative meanings of these terms are themselves not fixed, it is unintelligible and too reassuring to simply predict that new technologies will enhance human beings.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nietzsche's overhuman is an ideal. Whereas posthumans will be real.Bill Hibbard - 2010 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 21 (1):9-12.
In defense of posthuman dignity.Nick Bostrom - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (3):202–214.
Destiny and Desire.Russell Blackford - 2021 - Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies 31 (1):1-24.
Body and the Limit of Human Enhancement.Jin-Woo Lee - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 65:49-53.
Enhanced, Improved, Perfected?Stephen Rainey - 2012 - The New Bioethics 18 (1):21-35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-17

Downloads
99 (#213,774)

6 months
19 (#154,774)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ciano Aydin
University of Twente

References found in this work

The Future of Human Nature.Jürgen Habermas - 2003 - Cambridge, UK: Polity. Edited by Jürgen Habermas.
The Future of Human Nature.Jurgen Habermas - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (309):483-486.
A history of transhumanist thought.Nick Bostrom - 2005 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 14 (1):1-25.

View all 28 references / Add more references