Perché la scienza è importante per la filosofia?

Gregorianum 90 (2):335-354 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When dealing with the issue of the relations among science, philosophy and theology, one finds several misunderstandings. One is that natural sciences essentially offend the value of the human person. Many think that the central place of empirical data in natural sciences is in disharmony with the universal tenets of both philosophy and theology. The idea that science and philosophy are necessarily in conflict is based on a misunderstanding of both science and philosophy. The actual current paradigm shifts in natural sciences opens a new field for fruitful interaction with philosophy and theology

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Che tipo di scienza è la scienza nuova di Vico?Paolo Rossi - 2004 - Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 2.
Perché il pensiero sistemico in filosofia?Lucia Urbani Ulivi - 2010 - Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 102 (2):221.
Perché la filosofia?Victoria Camps - 2012 - Rivista di Filosofia 103 (3):377-392.
Perché la filosofia.V. Prestipino - 1984 - Filosofia Oggi 7 (2):165-178.
.[author unknown] - unknown
Perché insegnare filosofia.Giancarlo Galeazzi - 2003 - Studium 99 (2):261-266.
Perché tanta filosofia?Carlo Augusto Viano - 1997 - Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 10 (3):531-537.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references