- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Weak Quantum Theory: Complementarity and Entanglement in Physics and Beyond [Book Review]
Foundations of Physics 32 (3):379-406 (2002)
Abstract
The concepts of complementarity and entanglement are considered with respect to their significance in and beyond physics. A formally generalized, weak version of quantum theory, more general than ordinary quantum theory of physical systems, is outlined and tentatively applied to two examplesLinks
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Weak Quantum Theory: Complementarity and Entanglement in Physics and Beyond.H. Atmanspacher, H. Romer & H. Wallach - 2002 - Foundations of Physics 32 (3):379-406.
The Concept of Complementarity and its Role in Quantum Entanglement and Generalized Entanglement.Thilo Hinterberger & Nikolaus Stillfried - 2013 - Axiomathes 23 (3):443-459.
The Concept of Complementarity and its Role in Quantum Entanglement and Generalized Entanglement.Thilo Hinterberger & Nikolaus von Stillfried - 2013 - Global Philosophy 23 (3):443-459.
On the Character of Quantum Law: Complementarity, Entanglement, and Information.Arkady Plotnitsky - 2017 - Foundations of Physics 47 (8):1115-1154.
Generalized Quantum Theory: Overview and Latest Developments. [REVIEW]Thomas Filk & Hartmann Römer - 2011 - Axiomathes 21 (2):211-220.
Complementarity and Information in “Delayed-choice for Entanglement Swapping”.Časlav Brukner, Markus Aspelmeyer & Anton Zeilinger - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (11):1909-1919.
Metafizyczne implikacje fizyki kwantowej (przeł. Elżbieta Drozdowska).Tim Maudlin & Elżbieta Drozdowska - 2021 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 69 (4):407-439.
Can the entanglement be considered a basic concept of quantum mechanics?Canio Noce, Lidia Truda & Alberto Trotta - 2022 - Science and Philosophy 10 (1):57-69.
Partial Measurements and the Realization of Quantum-Mechanical Counterfactuals.G. S. Paraoanu - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (7):1214-1235.
The entangled God: divine relationality and quantum physics.Kirk Wegter-McNelly - 2011 - London: Routledge.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
259 (#81,556)
6 months
10 (#382,402)
2009-01-28
Downloads
259 (#81,556)
6 months
10 (#382,402)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling?Emmanuel M. Pothos & Jerome R. Busemeyer - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):255-274.
Quantum Structure in Cognition: Human Language as a Boson Gas of Entangled Words.Diederik Aerts & Lester Beltran - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (3):755-802.
The Potential of Using Quantum Theory to Build Models of Cognition.Zheng Wang, Jerome R. Busemeyer, Harald Atmanspacher & Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (4):672-688.
Quantum Structure in Cognition: Human Language as a Boson Gas of Entangled Words.Diederik Aerts & Lester Beltran - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (3):755-802.
A Quantum Question Order Model Supported by Empirical Tests of an A Priori and Precise Prediction.Zheng Wang & Jerome R. Busemeyer - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (4):689-710.
References found in this work
The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (2nd edition).David J. Chalmers - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky & Nathan Rosen - 1935 - Physical Review (47):777-780.
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox.J. S. Bell - 1987 - In John Stewart Bell (ed.), Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics: collected papers on quantum philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 14--21.
Louis Osgood Kattsoff. Modality and probability. The philosophical review, vol. 46 (1937), pp. 78–85.Garrett Birkhoff & John von Neumann - 1937 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 2 (1):44-44.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-xdvnm uwo