On Downey's conjecture

Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (2):401-441 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We prove that the degree structures of the d.c.e. and the 3-c.e. Turing degrees are not elementarily equivalent, thus refuting a conjecture of Downey. More specifically, we show that the following statement fails in the former but holds in the latter structure: There are degrees f > e > d > 0 such that any degree u ≤ f is either comparable with both e and d, or incomparable with both

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A δ02 set with barely σ02 degree.Rod Downey, Geoffrey Laforte & Steffen Lempp - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1700 - 1718.
A refutation of pure conjecture.Timothy Cleveland - 1997 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (1):55-81.
On the strong Martin conjecture.Masanori Itai - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):862-875.
The Ethics of Reasoning from Conjecture.Micah Schwartzman - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (4):521-544.
The art of conjecture.Bertrand de Jouvenel - 1967 - New York,: Basic Books. Edited by N. M. Lary & Daniel J. Mahoney.
A strategy for assessing closure.Peter Murphy - 2006 - Erkenntnis 65 (3):365 - 383.
Truth and meaning.Robert C. Cummins - 2002 - In Joseph Keim-Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Meaning and Truth: Investigations in Philosophical Semantics. Seven Bridges Press. pp. 175-197.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-12

Downloads
16 (#901,783)

6 months
11 (#232,073)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references