A Social Pragmatic View on the Concept of Normative Consistency

European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 11 (2):56--78 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The programmatic statement put forward in von Wright's last works on deontic logic introduces the perspective of logical pragmatics, which has been formally explicated here and extended so to include the role of norm-recipient as well as the role of norm-giver. Using the translation function from the language of deontic logic to the language of set-theoretical approach, the connection has been established between the deontic postulates, on one side, and the perfection properties of the norm-set and the counter-set, on the other side. In the study of conditions of rational norm-related activities it has been shown that diverse dynamic second-order norms related to the concept of the consistency norm-system hold: -- the norm-giver ought to restore ``classical'' consistency by revising an inconsistent system, -- the norm-recipient ought to preserve an inconsistent system by revision of its logic so that inconsistency does not imply destruction of the system. Dialetheic deontic logic of Priest is a suitable logic for the purpose since it preserves other perfection properties of the system.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A norm-giver meets deontic action logic.Robert Trypuz & Piotr Kulicki - 2011 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (1-2):2011.
Norm Performatives and Deontic Logic.Rosja Mastop - 2011 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (2):83-105.
Norms of higher order.G. H. von Wright - 1983 - Studia Logica 42 (2-3):119 - 127.
A Paraconsistentist Approach to Chisholm's Paradox.Marcelo Esteban Coniglio & Newton Marques Peron - 2009 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 13 (3):299-326.
A logical typology of normative systems.Berislav Žarnić - 2010 - Journal of Applied Ethics and Philosophy 2 (1):30-40.
Deontic Logic and Legal Systems.Pablo E. Navarro & Jorge L. Rodríguez - 2014 - New York , NY: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Jorge L. Rodriguez.
Deontic Logic with Defeasible Detachment.Xiaochang Yu - 1995 - Dissertation, University of Georgia
Basic Action Deontic Logic.Alessandro Giordani & Ilaria Canavotto - 2016 - In Olivier Roy, Allard Tamminga & Malte Willer (eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. London, UK: College Publications. pp. 80-92.
An Intuitionistic Reformulation of Mally’s Deontic Logic.Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (4):635-641.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-24

Downloads
204 (#98,186)

6 months
49 (#88,863)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Berislav Žarnić
University Zagreb

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Rationality Through Reasoning.John Broome (ed.) - 2013 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
In contradiction: a study of the transconsistent.Graham Priest - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
[Omnibus Review].Thomas Jech - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):261-262.

View all 11 references / Add more references