Reply to Smart

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):177 – 178 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/00048400600758920

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Smart.J. J. Haldane - 1996 - In J. J. C. Smart & J. J. Haldane (eds.), Atheism and Theism. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 171–197.
A reply to Smart, Mayo and Thalberg on "tensed statements".Richard M. Gale - 1963 - Philosophical Quarterly 13 (53):351-356.
Is the Humean Defeated by Induction? A Reply to Smart.Eduardo Castro - 2016 - Philosophia 44 (2):435-446.
Introduction to Special Issue: The Philosophy of D. M. Armstrong.Peter Anstey - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):155 – 157.
David Armstrong and perception.Max Deutscher - 1963 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):80-88.
Max Deutscher and perception.David M. Armstrong - 1963 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):246-249.
Mr Arthadeva and naive realism.David M. Armstrong - 1959 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):67-70.
On defining incorrigibility.Edward Kroiter - 1972 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):279-282.
Armstrong on sensations of heat.Godfrey N. A. Vesey - 1963 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):250-254.
Sense and reference in aesthetics—2. A reply.Ruth Saw - 1963 - British Journal of Aesthetics 3 (4):365-366.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#472,742)

6 months
33 (#121,275)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Non-Governing Conception of Laws of Nature.Helen Beebee - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):571-594.
The Two Davids and Australian Materialism.A. R. J. Fisher - 2022 - In Peter R. Anstey & David Braddon-Mitchell (eds.), Armstrong's Materialist Theory of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 29-51.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references