Does Polanyi’s Thought Affirm A “Correspondence Thesis”?

Tradition and Discovery 39 (2):27-28 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

These remarks are comments on Tihamér Margitay’s criticisms of Polanyi’s so-called “correspondence thesis” in his recent essay “From Epistemology to Ontology.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

“Tihamér Margitay on Polanyi’s Ontology.Phil Mullins - 2012 - Tradition and Discovery 39 (2):9-9.
What Engineers Can Do but Physicists Can’t.David W. Agler - 2012 - Tradition and Discovery 39 (2):22-26.
What Engineers Can Do but Physicists Can’t.David W. Agler - 2012 - Tradition and Discovery 39 (2):22-26.
Margitay on Emergence and Ontological Hierarchy.Kyle Takaki - 2012 - Tradition and Discovery 39 (2):35-41.
Multiple Paths to Ontology.Walter B. Gulick - 2012 - Tradition and Discovery 39 (2):10-15.
Multiple Paths to Ontology.Walter B. Gulick - 2012 - Tradition and Discovery 39 (2):10-15.
Polanyi’s Ontology from Inside. [REVIEW]Tihamér Margitay - 2012 - Tradition and Discovery 39 (2):42-58.
On Margitay’s Notion of Reduction by Definition.Gergely Kertész - 2012 - Tradition and Discovery 39 (2):16-21.
Polanyi’s Scholarly Influence: A Review Article.Walter B. Gulick - 2004 - Tradition and Discovery 31 (1):11-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-12

Downloads
9 (#1,270,450)

6 months
4 (#1,006,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references