The Weber–Fechner law: A misnomer that persists but that should go away

Psychological Review 128 (4):757-765 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/rev0000278

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

An interpretation of the Weber-Fechner law.Harvey Carr - 1927 - Psychological Review 34 (4):313-319.
The Weber-Fechner law and the discrimination of color mass.B. R. Philip - 1941 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 29 (4):323.
The Weber-Fechner law and mental measurement.F. M. Urban - 1933 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 16 (2):221.
Weber-Fechner Law and the Optimality of the Logarithmic Scale.R. D. Portugal & B. F. Svaiter - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (1):73-81.
The inconstancy of the Weber-Fechner 'constant' for audition.C. W. Telford & W. E. Denk - 1935 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (1):106.
Review of Gustav Theodor Fechner. [REVIEW]G. A. Tawney - 1897 - Psychological Review 4 (3):310-312.
The Fechner number.No Authorship Indicated - 1906 - Psychological Review 13 (3):141-141.
Did Fechner measure "introspectional" sensations?H. M. Johnson - 1929 - Psychological Review 36 (4):257-284.
Did Fechner measure sensation?E. G. Boring - 1928 - Psychological Review 35 (5):443-445.
La loi de Weber et celle de fechner.B. Bourdon - 1919 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 88:119 - 121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-23

Downloads
13 (#1,066,279)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references