The Blasphemy Laws of Pakistan: Experimenting with History and Tradition

In Jessica Giles, Andrea Pin & Frank S. Ravitch (eds.), Law, Religion and Tradition. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 29-42 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Blasphemy Laws of Pakistan are arguably the most controversial piece of legislation in the country’s constitution. Rooted in its colonial past, the Laws have evolved with Pakistan and continue to hold tremendous importance in its identity formation. The Laws have been used by both religious and liberal agents to shape the meta-narrative and are often used by politicians to gain votes. An in-depth analysis of their formation and evolution can best explain how the Laws gained such prominence in the national discourse of Pakistan. The chapter starts with such an attempt. In order to provide a more contemporary understanding of how Pakistani society sees the Laws, discourse from leading newspapers is also captured and analyzed via the lens of Epistemic governance. The resulting analysis reveals religious traditions, religious historical and the nationalist historical roots of the Laws, explaining why they continue to dominate the national narrative in Pakistan.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Laws and meta-laws of nature: Conservation laws and symmetries.Marc Lange - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (3):457-481.
On the Notion of “Law”.Maria Dalla Chiara & Roberto Giuntini - 2002 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:1-11.
Nuclear fears, hopes and realities in Pakistan.Pervez Hoodbhoy & Zia Mian - 2014 - International Affairs 90 (5):1125--1142.
The Logic of Historical Explanation.Clayton Roberts - 1995 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Laws and Criteria.Alexander Bird - 2002 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (4):511-541.
Laws in Physics.Mathias Frisch - 2014 - European Review 22:S33-S49.
Logic and the Laws of Thought.Jessica Leech - 2015 - Philosophers' Imprint 15.
A commentary and review of Montesquieu's spirit of laws: prepared for press from the original.Comte Antoine Louis Claude Destutt de Tracy - 1811 - Clark, N.J.: Lawbook Exchange. Edited by Jean-Antoine-Nicolas Caritat Condorcedet, Helvétius & Thomas Jefferson.
Lange’s Challenge: Accounting for Meta-laws.Zanja Yudell - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (2):347-369.
Are Conservation Laws Metaphysically Necessary?Johanna Wolff - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):898-906.
Historical laws in modern biology.Not By Me - 1983 - Acta Biotheoretica 32 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
11 (#1,141,291)

6 months
3 (#982,484)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references