Society and Animals 13 (1):69-88 (2005)
AbstractThis paper compares the phenomenological structure of zoological exhibition to the pattern prevalent in pornography. It examines several disanalogies between the two, finds them lacking or irrelevant, and concludes that the proposed analogy is strong enough to serve as a critical lens through which to view the institution of zoos. The central idea uncovered in this process of interpretation is paradoxical: Zoos are pornographic in that they make the nature of their subjects disappear precisely by overexposing them. The paper asserts that the keep are thus degraded or marginalized through the marketing and consumption of their very visibility and criticizes the pretense of preservation. Furthermore, the paper subjects the related framework of captivity to Foucauldian analysis and critique—we see that the "zoöpticon" deserves designation as an island of power in the carceral archipelago of hegemonic social institutions mapped by Foucault. Hence, this paper suggests that the zoo as we know it be phased out in favor of richer and less oppressive modes of encountering other forms of life; toward this end, the paper explores and assesses alternative approaches to, and practices of, nonhuman animal spectatorship and cross-species conviviality
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Neither Man nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals.Carol J. Adams - 1994 - Continuum.
The Incarceration of Wildness: Wilderness Areas as Prisons.Thomas H. Birch - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (1):3-26.
Citations of this work
Improving Ethical Attitudes to Animals with Digital Technologies: The Case of Apes and Zoos.Simon Coghlan, Sarah Webber & Marcus Carter - 2021 - Ethics and Information Technology 23 (4):825-839.
Caregiver/Orangutan Relationships at Auckland Zoo.Alexandra Palmer, Julie Park & Nicholas Malone - 2016 - Society and Animals 24 (3):230-249.
Similar books and articles
Reading Zoos: Representations of Animals and Captivity.Randy Malamud - 1998 - New York University Press.
Can We Assess the Needs of Elephants in Zoos? Can We Meet the Needs of Elephants in Zoos?D. Mellen Jill, C. E. Barber Joseph & W. Miller Gary - 2008 - In Christen M. Wemmer & Catherine A. Christen (eds.), Elephants and Ethics: Toward a Morality of Coexistence. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Zoo Animal Welfare.Dita Wickins-Dražilová - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1):27-36.
Turning and Returning to God: Reflections on the Lectionary Texts for Lent.Marianne Meye Thompson - 2010 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 64 (1):5-17.
Zoos and Animal Rights: The Ethics of Keeping Animals.Stephen St C. Bostock - 1993 - Routledge.
Ever Since Hightower: The Politics of Agricultural Research Activism in the Molecular Age.Frederick H. Buttel - 2005 - Agriculture and Human Values 22 (3):275-283.
A Remark on the Tree Property in a Choiceless Context.Arthur W. Apter - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (5-6):585-590.
Show Your Teeth or Not: The Role of the Mouth and Eyes in Smiles and its Cross-Cultural Variations.Chao Liu, Yue Ge, Wen-Bo Luo & Yue-Jia Luo - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (6):450-452.
Normativity in Quine's Naturalism: The Technology of Truth-Seeking? [REVIEW]Wybo Houkes - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (2):251-267.