Comparative Analysis of Palingenesis Categories in Teachings of L.N. Tolstoy and Lao-zi

RUDN Journal of Philosophy 27 (2):361-371 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article deals with the issues of comparing the teachings of Tolstoy and Lao-zi according to the criterion of palingenesis, which is the basis for the construction of the entire ideological corpus of the most important treatise of Taoism “Tao de jing”. Lao-zi formulated the lapidary formula of palingenesis in the fortieth zhang of this treatise, recreating a picture of the harmonization of the Middle Kingdom, arguing that return is the movement of the Tao, and weakening is the action of the Tao. The principle of palingenesis is one of the fundamental principles for which Tolstoy uses Christological vocabulary, and Lao-zi uses embryological vocabulary. The choice of the palingenesis criterion for comparative analysis of the teachings is due to the fact that the latter works as an immutable law when setting the task of recreating harmony in social chaos. Based on the assessments of the content of the zhangs of the “Tao de jing” canon, a representative line of palingenesis elements is built: the category of knowledge/truth; the category of ignorance; the category of simplicity; the category of naturalness; the category of “baby”; the category of non-action; the category of nonviolence. The principles of Taoism are not expressed by Tolstoy with a research sequence in logical definitions, but appear as categories and trends, working in the worldview of the Yasnaya Polyana sage. In the works “What is my faith?”, “Sayings of the Chinese sage Lao-Tse”, “Non-doing”, Tolstoy's teaching is presented in its entirety and is therefore convenient for comparison with the Taoist classics. It is noted that Tolstoy's conceptual idea is based on the desire to convert people to the good - unity with all people. This orientation towards the good is nothing else than the return to man of his original nature, on the way to which the principle of palingenesis associated with the boycott of the civilization of violence is realized. The conducted research has shown that in the teachings of Lao-zi and Tolstoy, which record the experience of theoretical exploration of the world, the categories of palingenesis are common to the Russian and Chinese spirit.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Axiomatizing a category of categories.Colin McLarty - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (4):1243-1260.
Kant and Hegel’s Views on ‘Category’: a Comparative Investigation.Mohammad Meshkat & Mehdi Dehbashi - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 11 (41):103-128.
Spinoza and Tolstoy in Valentin Asmus’ comparative analysis.Svetlana Klimova - 2021 - Studies in East European Thought 74 (3):345-357.
Categories.Javier Cumpa - 2020 - Philosophy Compass 15 (1):e12646.
Our Atoms, Ourselves: Lucretius on the Psychology of Personal Identity (DRN 3.843–864).Maeve Lentricchia - 2020 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 41 (2):297-328.
Self-Relation in Hegel’s Science of Logic.Edward Halper - 1981 - Philosophy Research Archives 7:89-133.
The No-Category Ontology.O. Bueno, S. A. Shalkowski & J. Busch - 2015 - The Monist 98 (3):233-245.
A theorem on barr-exact categories, with an infinitary generalization.Michael Makkai - 1990 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 47 (3):225-268.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-24

Downloads
7 (#1,369,174)

6 months
6 (#510,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references