Don’t mention it

The Philosophers' Magazine 44:69-73 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How we share the world, what conceptual framework might allow us to grasp the sharing, once the bleak world-in-itself is unavailable and all we have are our personalised worlds, remains a total mystery. Science can get along quite well without solving it, but cosmologists need to take it seriously. For philosophers, however, that the world we take for granted is a conceptual mess poses a problem.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Don’t mention it.Alastair Hannay - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 44:69-73.
The religious stance.Alastair Hannay - 2010 - The Philosophers' Magazine 50 (50):60-61.
Mention and Designation.Evan Simpson - 1968 - Analysis 29 (1):1 - 4.
What's in a Name?Don S. Levi - 2008 - Philosophical Investigations 31 (4):340-358.
Contextualism and the use-mention distinction.Štefan Riegelnik - 2011 - Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 7 (2):281-290.
Why Lesbian Ethics?Sarah Lucia Hoagland - 1992 - Hypatia 7 (4):195 - 206.
Review of Doomsday End of the World Scenarios by Richard Moran (2003).Michael Starks - 2017 - Philosophy, Human Nature and the Collapse of Civilization Michael Starks 3rd Ed. (2017).

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
5 (#1,545,183)

6 months
3 (#984,114)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Alastair Hannay
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references