Don’t mention it

The Philosophers' Magazine 44:69-73 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How we share the world, what conceptual framework might allow us to grasp the sharing, once the bleak world-in-itself is unavailable and all we have are our personalised worlds, remains a total mystery. Science can get along quite well without solving it, but cosmologists need to take it seriously. For philosophers, however, that the world we take for granted is a conceptual mess poses a problem

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reach's Puzzle and Mention.Richard Gaskin & Daniel J. Hill - 2013 - Dialectica 67 (2):201-222.
Reasons for action: Internal vs. external.Stephen Finlay & Mark Schroeder - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
When a "white horse" is not a "horse".Kirill Ole Thompson - 1995 - Philosophy East and West 45 (4):481-499.
Quotational mixing of use and mention.Ori Simchen - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):325-336.
Descriptions as predicates.Delia Graff Fara - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 102 (1):1-42.
Breaking Quotations.Emar Maier - 2008 - In Satoh et al (ed.), New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 187-200.
Mr. Geach on mention and use.R. M. Martin - 1949 - Mind 58 (232):523-524.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
35 (#459,290)

6 months
6 (#530,055)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Alastair Hannay
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references