The religious stance

The Philosophers' Magazine 50 (50):60-61 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How we share the world, what conceptual framework might allow us to grasp the sharing, once the bleak world-in-itself is unavailable and all we have are our personalised worlds, remains a total mystery. Science can get along quite well without solving it, but cosmologists need to take it seriously. For philosophers, however, that the world we take for granted is a conceptual mess poses a problem

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Toward a Pragmatic Conception of Religious Faith.Joshua L. Golding - 1990 - Faith and Philosophy 7 (4):486-503.
Receptivity to Mystery: Cultivation, Loss, and Scientism.Ian James Kidd - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (3):51-68.
Matters of Meaning.Peter J. Mehl - 1997 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 4 (1-2):26-32.
Phenomenology as a Form of Empathy.Matthew Ratcliffe - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (5):473-495.
Religious disagreement: internal and external. [REVIEW]Dennis Potter - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):21-31.
The contextual stance.Gordon R. Foxall - 1999 - Philosophical Psychology 12 (1):25-46.
Intentional systems.Daniel C. Dennett - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (February):87-106.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
42 (#382,240)

6 months
1 (#1,478,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Alastair Hannay
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references