Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Certain very large cardinals are not created in small forcing extensions.Richard Laver - 2007 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 149 (1-3):1-6.
    The large cardinal axioms of the title assert, respectively, the existence of a nontrivial elementary embedding j:Vλ→Vλ, the existence of such a j which is moreover , and the existence of such a j which extends to an elementary j:Vλ+1→Vλ+1. It is known that these axioms are preserved in passing from a ground model to a small forcing extension. In this paper the reverse directions of these preservations are proved. Also the following is shown : if V is a model (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Changing the heights of automorphism towers.Joel David Hamkins & Simon Thomas - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 102 (1-2):139-157.
    If G is a centreless group, then τ denotes the height of the automorphism tower of G. We prove that it is consistent that for every cardinal λ and every ordinal α<λ, there exists a centreless group G such that τ=α; and if β is any ordinal such that 1β<λ, then there exists a notion of forcing , which preserves cofinalities and cardinalities, such that τ=β in the corresponding generic extension.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Changing the Heights of Automorphism Towers by Forcing with Souslin Trees over L.Gunter Fuchs & Joel David Hamkins - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (2):614 - 633.
    We prove that there are groups in the constructible universe whose automorphism towers are highly malleable by forcing. This is a consequence of the fact that, under a suitable diamond hypothesis, there are sufficiently many highly rigid non-isomorphic Souslin trees whose isomorphism relation can be precisely controlled by forcing.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Closed maximality principles: implications, separations and combinations.Gunter Fuchs - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (1):276-308.
    l investigate versions of the Maximality Principles for the classes of forcings which are <κ-closed. <κ-directed-closed, or of the form Col (κ. <Λ). These principles come in many variants, depending on the parameters which are allowed. I shall write MPΓ(A) for the maximality principle for forcings in Γ, with parameters from A. The main results of this paper are: • The principles have many consequences, such as <κ-closed-generic $\Sigma _{2}^{1}(H_{\kappa})$ absoluteness, and imply. e.g., that ◇κ holds. I give an application (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations