Linker histones versus HMG1/2: a struggle for dominance?

&
Bioessays 20 (7):584-588 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1002/(sici)1521-1878(199807)20:7<584::aid-bies10>3.0.co;2-w

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Are linker histones (histone H1) dispensable for survival?Juan Ausió - 2000 - Bioessays 22 (10):873-877.
What do linker histones do in chromatin?Alan P. Wolffe, Saadi Khochbin & Stefan Dimitrov - 1997 - Bioessays 19 (3):249-255.
How do linker histones mediate differential gene expression?Colyn Crane-Robinson - 1999 - Bioessays 21 (5):367-371.
Unusual DNA structures, chromatin and transcription.Kensal van Holde & Jordanka Zlatanova - 1994 - Bioessays 16 (1):59-68.
The nucleosome core particle: does it have structural and physiologic relevance?Kensal van Holde & Jordanka Zlatanova - 1999 - Bioessays 21 (9):776-780.
Chromatin architectural proteins and transcription factors: A structural connection.Kensal van Holde & Jordanka Zlatanova - 1996 - Bioessays 18 (9):697-700.
Review essay: A coherentist epistemology with integrity.Maureen Linker - 1999 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (3):121-124.
Testosterone and the concept of dominance.James M. Dabbs - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):370-371.
Explaining how and explaining why: Developmental and evolutionary explanations of dominance.Anya Plutynski - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (3):363-381.
Dominance runs deep.Valerie J. Grant - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):376-377.
The dilemma of dominance.Douglas Allchin - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (2-3):427-451.
Category dominance, instance dominance, and categorization time.Elizabeth F. Loftus - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (1):70.
Problems with the concept of dominance and lack of empirical support for a testosterone–dominance link.John Archer - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):363-363.
Cost-Benefit versus Expected Utility Acceptance Rules.Alex C. Michalos - 1970 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970 (1):375-402.
Approach–Avoidance versus Dominance–Submissiveness: A Multilevel Neural Framework on How Testosterone Promotes Social Status.David Terburg & Jack van Honk - 2013 - Emotion Review 5 (3):296-302.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
10 (#1,187,343)

6 months
7 (#419,303)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references