Philosophy of Science 82 (5):930-940 (2015)
AbstractForster presented some interesting examples having to do with distinguishing the direction of causal influence between two variables, which he argued are counterexamples to the likelihood theory of evidence. In this paper, we refute Forster's arguments by carefully examining one of the alleged counterexamples. We argue that the example is not convincing as it relies on dubious intuitions that likelihoodists have forcefully criticized. More importantly, we show that contrary to Forster's contention, the consilience-based methodology he favored is accountable within the framework of the LTE.
Similar books and articles
Counterexamples to a likelihood theory of evidence.Malcolm R. Forster - 2006 - Minds and Machines 16 (3):319-338.
Likelihoods, Multiple Universes, and Epistemic Context.Lydia McGrew - 2005 - Philosophia Christi 7 (2):475 - 481.
On the Use of Likelihood as a Guide to Truth.Steven Orla Kimbrough - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:117 - 128.
A New Argument for the Likelihood Ratio Measure of Confirmation.David H. Glass & Mark McCartney - 2015 - Acta Analytica 30 (1):59-65.
The taking of a position: A reinterpretation of the elaboration likelihood model.Andrew J. Cook, Kevin Moore & Gary D. Steel - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (4):315–331.
Objective evidence and absence: Comment on Sober.Michael Strevens - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (1):91 - 100.
On The Likelihood Principle and a Supposed Antinomy.Barry Loewer, Robert Laddaga & Roger Rosenkrantz - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:279 - 286.
Don't Believe the Hype: Why Should Philosophical Theories Yield to Intuitions?Moti Mizrahi - 2015 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 34 (3):141-158.
Selection Biases in Likelihood Arguments.Matthew Kotzen - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (4):825-839.
A dual-process specification of causal conditional reasoning.Niki Verschueren, Walter Schaeken & G. - 2005 - Thinking and Reasoning 11 (3):239 – 278.
Miraculous consilience of quantum mechanics.Malcolm R. Forster - 2010 - In Ellery Eells & James Fetzer (eds.), The Place of Probability in Science. Springer. pp. 201--228.
Hobbes's religion and political philosophy: A reply to Greg Forster.Aloysius Martinich, S. Vaughan & D. L. Williams - 2008 - History of Political Thought 29 (1):49-64.
On the Empirical Adequacy of Composite Statistical Hypotheses.Joseph F. Hanna - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:73-80.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation.James Woodward - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Sociobiology: The New Synthesis.Edward O. Wilson - 1975 - Journal of the History of Biology 33 (3):577-584.
Making Things Happen. A Theory of Causal Explanation.Michael Strevens - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):233-249.