Ross's Antinomy and Modal Arguments for God's Existence

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 20 (2/3):159 - 164 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00141018

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What Swinburne should have concluded.Charles E. Gutenson - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (3):243-247.
On the existence of a modal antinomy.Gunnar Niemi - 1972 - Synthese 23 (4):463 - 476.
Book Review:The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and against the Existence of God. J. L. Mackie. [REVIEW]Steven L. Ross - 1982 - Ethics 94 (4):718-.
The antinomy of designation.Gordon Matheson - 1959 - Philosophy of Science 26 (3):260-269.
Foreknowledge, Evil, and Compatibility Arguments.Jeff Speaks - 2011 - Faith and Philosophy 28 (3):269-293.
Ross and Scotus on the Existence of God: Two Proofs from Possibility.G. Randolph Mayes - 1990 - The Thomist 54 (1):97-114.
Death and God: The case of Richard Swinburne.Victor Cosculluela - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (3):293-302.
Modal theistic arguments.Graham Oppy - 1993 - Sophia 32 (2):17-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#359,559)

6 months
4 (#776,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Zeis
Canisius College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Necessary beings.Thomas V. Morris - 1985 - Mind 94 (374):263-272.

Add more references