Reported Miracles: A Critique of Hume

Philosophical Review 105 (4):538 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Joseph Houston’s book is a fine contribution to the philosophical investigation of the value of miracle reports for religious apologetics. It covers a wide range of arguments of interest to philosophers about the concept of miracles and the justifiability of belief in their occurrence, but it is also rich in theological and biblical sources. Houston’s reasoning throughout is careful and subtle, but neither technical nor excessively pedantic. So while the book is primarily intended for scholars, students should find it within their reach.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reported Miracles. [REVIEW]Linda Zagzebski - 1996 - Philosophical Review 105 (4):538-540.
Reported Miracles: A Critique of Hume.Joseph Houston - 1994 - Religious Studies 31 (2):275-276.
Joseph HOUSTON, "Reported Miracles. A Critique of Hume". [REVIEW]D. Stauffer - 1995 - Revue de Théologie Et de Philosophie 127:380.
Reported Miracles: A Critique of Hume.J. Houston - 1994 - Cambridge University Press.
Hume, Contrary Miracles, and Religion as We Find It.Michael Jacovides - 2022 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 39 (2):147-161.
Miracles as evidence against the existence of God.Christine Overall - 1985 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):347-353.
Miracles.David Basinger - 2018 - Cambridge University Press.
Authenticating Biblical Reports of Miracles.Phillip H. Wiebe - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:309-325.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-07

Downloads
12 (#317,170)

6 months
37 (#417,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Linda Zagzebski
University of Oklahoma

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references